Kategorie:
Sustainability, Health & Nutrition
28.07.2025

LCA indicates lower environmental impact of Elopak D-PAK™ carton refill vs LDPE pouch

A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), shows the D-PAK™ carton refill system has a lower impact on global warming when compared to a plastic pouch. This article examines why Elopak commissioned this study, how the results confirm the sustainability performance of the D-PAK™ carton and how we will use the results to improve our cartons and filling systems. 

The study, commissioned by Elopak and undertaken by Anthesis,  an external sustainability consultancy, compared the environmental impact of using the 1 L D-PAK™ carton as a refill pack for a bottle of laundry detergent versus two sizes of the flexible LDPE pouches.

The study found that cartons significantly outperform pouches across several categories, notably global warming, CO2 footprint, resource scarcity impact, and plastic reduction.

“With a Life Cycle Assessment, we have the tool to get the evidence and transparency of the potential impact of our products. Applying an LCA has provided a lens through which to assess, measure and refine the performance of the D-PAK™ cartons as a refill option in non-food categories. The facts and figures speak for themselves. Customers can now make date driven decisions to address the growing consumer and regulatory demand for more eco-friendly products reducing plastic and carbon emissions.”
Dirk Endlich, Vice President Plastic to Carton, Elopak

What is a LCA?

A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a method used to measure the environmental impacts of a product or process throughout its entire life cycle. The LCA can be used to analyse and compare the environmental impacts of different scenarios. The results can be used to identify hotspots for impact reduction and inform innovation and provide solutions for reducing impacts across a range of environmental indicators.

Scope of study

Elopak commissioned the European study to fully understand the environmental impacts of the use of the D-PAK™ as a refill pack in a non-food (detergent) refill system for a 1L PP bottle, and comparing these impacts to equivalent refill systems that use an LDPE pouch. 

The functional unit of the study is “The packaging required to provide 11 litres of detergent to a customer’ and to identify the packaging impacts to refill 1L PP detergent bottled 10 times (original content plus refills). 

The study compared three detergent refill systems; the Elopak D-PAK carton and two sizes of the flexible LDPE pouches (across 0%, 50% and 100% recycled content options).

Which three refill packs did the study test?

System 1: 1L PP detergent bottle refilled with 1L D-PAK™ carton
System 2: 1L PP detergent bottle refilled with 1.8L LDPE pouch
System 3: 1L PP detergent bottle refilled with 1L LDPE pouch 

The packages were tested across a full set of 18 impact categories from the ReCiPe impact assessment method. 

To be clear about the scope of study, Elopak specified what was included and what was excluded in the process.  

Included:

Raw materials extraction and production  
Packaging manufacturing process  
End-of-Life waste management via landfill, recycling or incineration (including transport impacts)

Excluded:

All impacts associated with the detergent that the packaging formats are intended to contain (incl. filling impacts).
All impacts associated with retail and use of products 
The impacts of tertiary packaging for all packaging formats 
The impacts of tertiary packaging for all packaging formats 

Study boundaries

It was important to Elopak that this study employed a cradle-to-gate plus end-of-life system boundary to assess the environmental profiles associated with these stages in the life cycle of all the packaging formats. 

1.
Raw material extraction, processing, and production of individual packaging components (caps, labels, bottles etc)
2. Transport to manufacturing sites
3. Manufacturing of the finished packaging format
4. Transport of empty packaging to the detergent filling site
5. Transport of filled packaging to retail/distribution centre
6. Transport to end-of-life
7. End-of-life treatment of all packaging

Results - D-PAK™​ is a responsible choice   

The LCA study for the refill-system with a D-PAK™ found that the carton has a 24-28% lower global warming and 33-38% lower resource scarcity impact compared to the refill systems with 1.8L and 1L plastic pouches.

Using D-PAK™ cartons as a refill system uses 44% less plastic than LDPE pouches. A D-PAK™ carton contains 9.0g of plastic, compared to 20.1g of plastic in an LDPE pouch and 76.7g in a polypropylene bottle.

The overall results of the LCA show that using the D-PAK™ for as a refill package for a non-food product such as laundry detergent will result in a lower environmental impact than the 1L pouch across 11 of the impact categories, and a lower environmental impact than the 1.8L pouch across 14 impact categories.

“The LCA shows that switching from plastic packaging to liquid packaging board has significant environmental benefits. Even when considering very material-efficient packaging, such as plastic pouches, significantly lower impacts on global warming and resource scarcity can be achieved. The results of the study show that using D-PAK for as a refill packaging has a lower environmental impact than the 1L pouch across with 24% CO2 reductions. A further 44% of plastic reduction is achieved by the scenario in this study, which helps customers in fulfilling their plastic reduction targets.”
Florian Wagner, Manager Circular Economy und Packaging, Elopak

How Elopak will use the LCA study

Following the launch of its strategy, Repackaging Tomorrow, in September 2024, Elopak is actively leveraging the global shift away from plastics as a central pillar of its growth strategy. This includes expanding the use of fiber-based packaging into new markets and product segments, responding to increasing demand from brands and consumers seeking sustainable alternatives. 

As part of this initiative, the findings of the LCA will not only empower customers to communicate verified sustainability benefits but also enable improvements in the design and manufacturing of the D-PAK™ carton, reinforcing Elopak’s commitment to innovation and environmental responsibility. 

The LCA can be found here.

Cleaning Repackaged: Jif in D-PAK™ Cartons 

Elopak’s D-PAK™ cartons are now replacing plastic bottles for Jif household cleaners in Norway. The products are now available in 750 ml and 1500 ml cartons, including Jif Krystal Grønnsåpe – a floor and surface cleaner made from pure wood oils. With this change, manufacturer Orkla Home & Personal Care is reducing its plastic consumption. At the same time, logistics are being simplified, and retailers benefit from a sustainable, shelf-ready alternative. 

Sustainable Refill: Hand Soap in D-PAK™ Carton 

Orkla Home & Personal Care is using Elopak’s 750 ml D-PAK™ carton for Lumme brand hand soap refills for the first time in Finland. The carton provides an environmentally friendly alternative to previous plastic refills while offering better value for money. One refill pack is enough for one and a half bottles of hand soap in the “Forest” and “Apple Blossom” fragrances. 

Embleton Hall Dairies chooses Pure-Pak® 

The British dairy Embleton Hall Dairies will fill its school milk in Pure-Pak® cartons from Elopak in the future. Pure-Pak® stands for sustainability and freshness, making milk consumption hygienic and practical for everyday school life. With the new Shikoku filling machine, the dairy can increase capacity and reduce waste. 

British health juice manufacturer The Benefit Brand brings fruity freshness and valuable vitamins to everyday life with a new drink. Filling in Elopak’s sustainable Pure-Pak® Classic Ambient carton guarantees the highest quality. Mango, passion fruit, and carrot strengthen the immune system, reduce fatigue, and help regulate hormones.